Sowore Sparks Outrage, Labels Obidients ‘Fools’ and Calls Movement a ‘Political Fraud’

Outspoken activist and former presidential candidate Omoyele Sowore has stirred fresh political controversy following remarks in which he sharply criticized the Obidient movement, a support base widely associated with Peter Obi. Speaking to journalists after a court appearance, Sowore described the movement in harsh terms, branding it a “political fraud” and accusing its supporters of being deceived.

The comments were made outside the Federal High Court, shortly after Sowore concluded legal proceedings related to a cybercrime charge that had previously been filed against him. The activist confirmed he had obtained a Certified True Copy of the court ruling striking out the case—one he has consistently maintained was politically motivated.

However, it was his remarks on the Obidient movement that drew the most attention.

Sowore alleged that many Nigerians aligned with the movement have been manipulated into believing they are part of a genuine reform effort, when in reality, he claims, they are being used to advance hidden political interests. He argued that a significant portion of supporters are unaware of what he described as contradictions within the movement.

“The pity you should feel is for those who are fooled by them,” he said, emphasizing that his criticism was directed not only at political actors but also at what he views as a broader culture of blind loyalty.

He further likened the movement to a “political Ponzi scheme,” suggesting that its structure mirrors deceptive systems that rely on sustained belief rather than tangible results. According to him, some supporters defend political figures regardless of past allegations, shifting positions based on convenience rather than accountability.

Sowore also highlighted what he described as inconsistencies in how certain political figures are perceived within the movement. He pointed to instances where individuals previously criticized were later embraced, arguing that such reversals undermine claims of principled politics.

The activist warned that such patterns could erode public trust and hinder genuine democratic progress. He stressed the need for Nigerians—especially younger voters—to critically evaluate political movements and avoid being swept up in what he called “manufactured narratives.”

His comments have since triggered widespread reactions across social and political spaces. While some observers agree with his call for greater scrutiny and accountability in political engagement, others have condemned the tone and language of his remarks, describing them as unnecessarily provocative.

Critics argue that dismissing a large group of politically active citizens as “fools” risks deepening divisions and discouraging civic participation. Supporters of the Obidient movement, in particular, have pushed back strongly, defending their involvement as part of a broader desire for change in Nigeria’s political landscape.

The Obidient movement emerged prominently during Nigeria’s recent electoral cycle, attracting a significant number of young voters and first-time participants. It has since remained a visible force in political discussions, often advocating for governance reforms, transparency, and accountability.

Sowore’s latest remarks highlight ongoing tensions within Nigeria’s opposition space, where differing ideologies and strategies continue to shape public discourse. As political actors position themselves ahead of future elections, such exchanges are likely to intensify.

Whether Sowore’s comments will influence public perception or simply add to the noise of an already charged political environment remains to be seen. What is clear, however, is that the debate over political movements, loyalty, and accountability in Nigeria is far from settled.